Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Tuesday Top 5: How to Retire as a Millionaire

scrooge-mcduckWelcome to this week’s edition of our Tuesday Top 5, our new weekly tips post to help you manage your money in five easy steps.

Today we tell you the five things you need to know if your end goal is retiring a millionaire. Sound like a pipe dream? It’s not if you start early enough.

  1. Think you don’t earn enough money to become the next Scrooge McDuck? Think again. Even if you’re only making $30,000 in your first job out of college, you can still do it with enough disciplineCNNMoney’s calculator says that if you stash $3,300 — 11 percent of your income — in a tax-deferred account like a 401(k) every year, you’ll hit your first million in just under 42 years (assuming the stock market’s average 8 percent annual return continues). While 42 years may sound like an eternity, isn’t being a millionaire worth it?
  2. Commit to savings today! Spend less than you earn and put the difference in a savings account. There’s a reason Einstein called compound interest “the most powerful force in the universe.” If you’re in your early 20s, this is the time to start.
  3. Research your options. There are several types of savings accounts that differ by degrees of risk and reward. A standard savings account allows regularly scheduled deposits and permits withdrawals at any time. Interest rates are relatively low but there is no risk of losing your savings.  A certificate of deposit (CD) may offer a higher rate of interest than a savings account; however, putting your money in a CD makes it inaccessible for the length of the deposit unless you pay a penalty and lose any interest earned. Like checking and savings accounts, CDs are usually FDIC-insured, meaning that you are covered if the bank fails.
  4. You don’t just need money in the far-off future. A good savings strategy covers short-term needs as well: things like emergency expenses, buying a car, and making other big purchases. Keeping about $1,000 liquid is a good idea so you can have instant access to it in case of an emergency — this will help you avoid putting it on plastic.
  5. Once you have achieved your targeted principal amount, it’s time to explore investing. Deposits placed in other types of investment vehicles will promise a higher rate of return but they do involve more risk than a savings account. Keep in mind there’s no such thing as a 6 percent return on your investment with no risk, and you should run from anyone who promises you this or any other low-risk, high-reward scheme. Determine your risk tolerance and find an investment that suits your needs, be it stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or other ways of growing your money.

The biggest lesson here: Compound interest is your friend. Nurture that friendship and it will serve you well for life.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Luxury denim meets the recession

Jeans

In this day of high fashion, it seems almost quaint to speak of an inexpensive pair of faded Levi’s jeans. Indeed, for proof that jeans have moved far beyond their role as the outfit of the working man, check out this Wall Street Journal article on “The Rise of Power Jeans.”

As designer denim became every girl’s go-to, prices went up; “luxury” jeans by companies like True Religion and Seven for all Mankind were fetching hundreds of dollars, the same price as a new computer.

Cotton dungarees for the price of an iPod was a stretch so extreme that retailers had to come up with a whole new term to suggest that the new jeans were different from the $100 jeans they used to sell in the 1990s.

But as this New York Times article points out, such a price point is only sustainable if consumers are willing to pay. When that willingness disappears – in this case, due to a recession – the speculative jean “bubble” starts to deflate.

But the denim bubble has burst, and only a handful of such extravagantly priced jeans remain…Meanwhile, the sweet spot for designer jeans has relocated to a neighborhood just below $200, even though the styles do not look substantially different from the $300 jeans that were on the sales floors of Barneys New York and Bloomingdale’s only two years ago.

“The bubble has burst,” or some variant of this phrase, was used so frequently during the housing crisis that it’s almost cliché. Where does this imagery come from?

Economists disagree on the exact causes of a speculative bubble; however, when the term is used, it generally means that consumers are willing to pay increasingly large amounts of money for a product based on its perceived value.

Whether it’s the housing bubble, internet bubble, or denim bubble – the common denominator is that they all “pop” eventually.  If the price of goods can rise rapidly due to consumer demand, they can also fall very quickly when the demand disappears.

Such is the case in the market for luxury jeans. As inventories built up in stores, retailers realized that a willingness to pay $400 for a pair of jeans no longer existed. So, retailers dropped the price below $200 – a market correction, as it’s called – and found the points at which consumers were again willing to spend money on designer denim.

Whether it’s $200 or $400, though, spending too much of your money on any luxury good may hamper your savings. If you’re shelling out serious cash for clothes, make sure the item is really an investment and not this season’s must-have trend. Check out our tips on fiscal responsibility here.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Taxi drivers: We’ll make an offer you can’t refuse

Taxi

Imagine you’re standing on a street corner in New York City, hand raised to hail a cab. Two cabs pull up to vie for your business; a beat-up late 60s sub-compact with no air conditioning, and a brand new mid-size sedan, with working air conditioner and an electronic meter.

It’s not hard to pick which door to open.

That’s the decision facing residents and visitors in Mumbai, India. As the city grows, so has the demand for clean and reliable taxis. The Meru cab company has answered that demand:

“Meru has become so popular that it has to turn away about half of the more than 10,000 calls it gets every day, and reservations have to be made about four hours in advance. “Nobody wants a black-and-white TV when you have LCD screens,” says (owner) Mr. Gupta.”

With such high demand, why haven’t new taxi companies sprouted all over Mumbai?

The reason is the disgruntled drivers of the old cabs. These drivers realize that the new cabs – equipped with such luxuries as GPS and functioning climate control – represent the end of their way of life. So, they’ve erected a pretty intimidating barrier to entry in the industry – physical violence.

Sheikh Shamin Ahmed… was eating chicken fried rice at a roadside stand next to his new, metallic-green cab when two old taxis full of old-taxi drivers rolled up and started to beat him. They told him his fancy new Mahindra Renault with its air conditioning and GPS navigation system had better stay away from their customers.

Now, although the violence is inexcusable, I don’t want to overlook the plight of the old cab driver. This new technology means they’ll have to learn a new skill set; older drivers who never learned to read in school may find themselves with no way to make a living. This often-painful process of new technology replacing old and outdated technology is called creative destruction, a term coined by the famous economist Joseph Schumpeter.

While the short-term consequences of creative destruction may be difficult for drivers of the old cabs, the long-term benefits to society are substantial. Modern cabs are safer, more comfortable, produce fewer harmful emissions, and allow cab drivers to update their skills and remain relevant for the 21st century. Additionally, free entry into the market for taxis ensures that consumers have a wide range of transportation options when they’re driving around Mumbai.

A growing city that wants to leap into modernity can’t support a taxi fleet that’s stuck in the 1960s. Just don’t tell those old taxi drivers I said so.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Famous Financial Flubs: Shooting Threes: Good; Holding Threes: Bad

Former NBA star Antoine Walker is the latest athlete to serve as a sad reminder of the importance of fiscal discipline. The Boston Globe recently reported that Walker, a 6’9” small forward who made at least $110 million over his 12 years in the NBA, owes more than $4 million to creditors. This comes after a July 2009 arrest for writing $1 million in bad checks while in Las Vegas.

awalker Walker was well-known as a gambler on the court. A prolific outside shooter, he was often criticized for attempting 3-point shots at the expense of higher percentage inside shots. (An average NBA three pointer goes in only 36.7% of the time compared to 48.5% for a 2 point shot.) This criticism was largely misplaced: Walker averaged 0.98 points per 3 pointer attempted versus 0.89 points per 2 pointer attempted.

His gambling off the court, on the other hand, was far less publicized at the time — and far more personally damaging. When you’re playing “$15,000 hands with Michael Jordan during an all-night gambling session where estimates of money lost and won totaled several hundred thousand dollars,” you might have a problem. A salary of $49 million — a conservative estimate of what he took home after taxes and agent fees — is a lot, but that’s not Jordan money.

And as we’ve talked about before, the hidden costs of being a celebrity and “taking care” of friends and family adds up quickly:

Off the court, there were the cars, the jewelry, the houses, the suits, the gambling. He liked to move in an outsized entourage; his mother estimates that, during his playing days, he was supporting 70 friends and family members in one way or another. And speaking of his mother, he built her a mansion in the Chicago suburbs, complete with an indoor pool, 10 bathrooms, and a full-size basketball court.

[…]

Living at the Bishops Forest condominium complex in Waltham during the Celtics season, Walker turned the pavement surrounding his home into a virtual luxury car lot – two Bentleys, two Mercedes, a Range Rover, a Cadillac Escalade, a bright red Hummer. Often, the vehicles were tricked out with custom paint jobs, rims, and sound systems at considerable added expense. He also collected top-line watches – Rolexes and diamond-encrusted Cartiers.

The lessons here are simple and apply to everyone, not just athletes making $9 million a year: Make sure you’re saving a good chunk of your salary, limit your risky investments/gambles, and create and track a budget so you can stay on top of your cash flow.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Tuesday Top 5: How to Improve Your Credit Score

Welcome to this week’s edition of Tuesday Top 5, our new weekly tips post to help you manage your money in five easy steps. Do you know what your credit score is? You should: It’s the most important factor in getting a loan. But what can you do if your FICO score looks more like your shoe size? Here’s what goes into calculating your credit rating — and what you can do to improve it:
  1. Payment history is the most important part of your credit score — it accounts for 35 percent of your rating, the largest portion. Continue to make payments on existing credit lines on time. (If you have not been making payments on time, now is a good time to start.) Get and stay current on your utility bills.
  2. After payment history, outstanding debt is the next most important consideration; it’s weighed at 30 percent of your score. Maxing out your credit limits on your credit card accounts kills your rating. So, pay down your plastic and aim to keep balances around 25 percent of your credit limit on each card.
  3. Length of credit history is also key. The Fair Isaac Corporation tells consumers, “Your FICO score measures the age of your oldest account and the average age of your accounts.” Figure out which of your cards has been in your name for the longest time and be sure to keep that account in good standing to improve this aspect of your rating.
  4. If you have a judgment against you — failure to pay taxes or child support, or even a reporting error because they do happen — get it cleared up as soon as possible. It will not go away until you do something about it, and is a big red flag on your credit history.
  5. Slow down on opening new accounts. Too many new account and credit checks in a short period of time can hurt your credit score. If you think you’ll apply for a mortgage or car loan in the next few months, limit the number of times your credit history is requested. Adding a few points on your credit score could translate to big savings on your mortgage interest rate.

Above all, be patient. It can take months or years to repair your credit score if it’s abysmal. For more info on credit scores, check out our Money Matters page on the subject.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Jimmy Choo Meets Econ4U

Shopping

The clothing company H&M has made a name for itself providing high-fashion clothing at prices that most people can afford. (BTW – I am not paid by H&M; this is what my wife has told me.)

On occasion, H&M enlists the services of an otherwise exclusive designer, to produce a line specifically for the store. The latest such luminary is Jimmy Choo, the shoe & handbag designer of Sex-and-the-City notoriety. The line will be released in H&M stores in November.

The most basic black pump in Choo’s high-end line retails for around $500, with newer and flashier items fetching well over $1,000. At H&M, the entry-level price point will be $99, with the most expensive shoe topping out at $299. It’s not exactly Payless, but considering the demand for the designer, these are bargain prices.

Indeed, H&M is anticipating such high demand for this product that they’ve created a section on their website: “How to Shop.” The first 160 people in line at H&M stores will receive bracelets limiting their time to shop the Choo collection.

Furthermore, of the 150+ H&M locations in the US, only 10 will carry the line. Five of those are in New York City.

What gives? Why doesn’t H&M want everyone to experience the newly-affordable luxury that Jimmy Choo has created?

ShoesNot exactly. By limiting the supply and the amount that can be purchased, H&M is accomplishing two things: it’s ensuring that the price won’t fall, and it’s ensuring that Jimmy Choo maintains its mystique.

Consider this – what if every H&M store in the United States carried unlimited amounts of this line? Sure, they might be busy on the first day, but after a time the consumer demand would be satisfied. Inventories would build, and H&M would have to put the shoes on sale. So, not only would Jimmy Choo shoes be on the feet of every girl in the US, but they’d be selling at a discount price. The horror!

Instead of such a nightmare scenario, H&M and Jimmy Choo have played it smart. They’ve made a limited quantity, so the demand for these shoes will be far from satisfied, and there won’t be any pressure to discount the price. Additionally, since only a relatively lucky few will be able to purchase these shoes, Jimmy Choo can retain the exclusive aura that surrounds its name.

Now, while you’re standing in line on November the 14th, you can explain to your fellow shoppers why the line has formed in the first place.

What’s your take on H&M & their supply of Choo’s shoes? Let’s hear about it in the comments!

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Frugality Now, Prosperity Later

brand-new-beamerAre you ever accused of being a cheapskate? If so, you have something in common with Linda Beech, a columnist for The Garden City Telegram, who wrote her latest opinion piece on why she bought a used car (instead of a new one) for her teenage daughter:

Years ago, when I had two small children and my first husband was diagnosed with a serious illness, I made a conscious decision to live a very frugal lifestyle. Even though my salary would have allowed us to spend more, I decided to live simply, with future needs in mind. This allowed us to “cover our bases” and still save up for emergencies, start a college fund for both kids, invest for retirement and buy a home.

Since then, my lifestyle has steadily improved (mostly due to the fact that there was nowhere to go but up!) and we continue to try to aim for improvement. Thankfully, my new husband and I are on the same wave-length when it comes to managing our spending.

We have an informal list of financial goals that we’re continually working toward. And while a brand new car is on the list, it is so far down, you’d need sonar to find it. I do believe, however, that there will come a time when we’ve accomplished so many of our goals that the new car will rise to the top of the list.

Beech teaches a valuable lesson: Just because you can afford the brightest and shiniest new thing doesn’t make it a smart purchase if it means compromising on your long-term goals.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Econ4U Popular Post Roundup

In case you missed them, here are a few of our most popular recent posts.  Be sure to check out two of our new recurring themes, the Tuesday Top 5 and Famous Financial Flubs.

Why isn’t college LESS expensive during a recession?

Tuesday Top 5: How to Write a Will

Avoid the Freshman Financial Fifteen

Famous Financial Flubs: Pamela Anderson Edition

When Is Carpetbagging A Smart Idea?

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Price Fixing: Why AT&T is Fixin’ for a Fight

Cowboy

In the news today is AT&T’s decision to sue a number of major producers of liquid crystal displays (LCDs). These ubiquitous displays are used in televisions, cell phones, and – most likely – the computer screen you’re using right now.

AT&T is alleging something called “price fixing” in the market to buy and sell these displays. So, why are they so upset about this?

For starters, price fixing is illegal in the US; breaking the law is almost always a good reason to get upset. However, regardless of legality, the higher prices it creates are bad for both big corporate consumers like AT&T, and individual consumers like you. Let’s look at an example.

Imagine there are two grocery stores in your hometown; Greg’s Groceries and Sheila’s Shop. Greg and Sheila compete for your business by researching each others prices, and then advertising sales that compare those prices – for instance, – “Buy Bananas at Sheila’s for 19 cents a pound! Compare to 29 cents per pound at Greg’s.” This is good for you, because each week you can shop at the store with the lowest banana price.

Now, let’s say Greg and Sheila get tired of receiving such a low price for bananas. So, they agree to both sell bananas at 49 cents a pound. This is price-fixing, and it’s bad for you because it means you’re paying more for bananas than you otherwise should be.

This brings us back to AT&T.

At some point, LCD panels likely fetched high prices; however, as the technology became less expensive, and more producers moved in to the market, prices decreased. LCD panel producers like Samsung and LG – our real-life Greg and Sheila – decided they didn’t like this one bit. In response, they allegedly decided to fix the price of LCDs, such that everyone who sells them would charge similarly high prices.

This didn’t sit well with AT&T, who had purchased 300 million mobile phone units with these pricey LCD displays. And it shouldn’t sit well with you, either, because the high price AT&T paid for the phones is eventually passed on to you.

As you might imagine, consumers rarely support higher fixed prices; who wants to pay more for anything? However, people will occasionally take leave of their common sense and support lower fixed prices. As we’ll see in a future blog post, these ideas may seem nice in theory, but they can have disastrous economic consequences.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live

Why isn’t college LESS expensive during a recession?

It has been difficult to pick up a newspaper the past week without seeing a story on the rising cost of college tuition; these articles from the LA Times and the Washington Post are representative.

College Costs Photo

College costs are in the news because of the College Board’s “Trends in College Pricing 2009” report, which  I would encourage you to read  for yourself. The general thrust captured by these newspapers is that published tuition and fees are up 6.5% for public universities and 4.4% for private ones from the previous school year.

How can this be? Have the colleges and universities not heard that our economy has been in a recession for at least the last year?

Indeed, our institutes of higher learning are acutely aware of the recession. In fact, the recession helps explain the increase in the cost of education.

Public universities receive state appropriations as part of their funding; those appropriations are taken from state tax dollars. The size of that funding tends to increase in a good economy, and decrease in a bad one. Even in lean years, though, universities can’t cut back spending too much, or else they risk harming those characteristics (research, faculty, etc) that contribute to their reputation. Thus, when student enrollment rises and state appropriations fall, public universities are forced to raise tuition and cut costs where possible.

Both public and private universities also depend on the generosity of their private donors, who fund their endowment. This money is especially important to more expensive private universities, who use endowments to fund expansion and keep college accessible for those students they choose to accept. Many endowments took huge hits during the financial crisis, so even very wealthy schools have cut back on spending. Harvard alone lost more than $10 billion, a hefty sum for any university.

Fortunately, it’s not all bad news. In the same way working professionals are concerned with their net pay –the amount of cash they’re taking home after taxes – potential students should take note of the net cost of college. Lost in the headlines about increasing tuition costs was this nugget: the price students pay for college–after financial aid is factored in–has fallen in the last five years, by about $1,100 at private universities and $400 at public ones. So while the sticker price on that great liberal arts college might be an unpalatable $26,300, the College Board estimates that financial aid and grants will reduce your net costs to a more reasonable $11,900.

Still – tuition plus the cost of living adds up to a hefty bill upon graduation. If you’re one of many Americans who paid for part or all of their education, then you’ve likely covered part of that bill with student loans. These loans are often referred to as “good” debt; you’re using them to finance an education, and interest rates and repayment terms (especially on federal loans) tend to be favorable.

But with median debt upon graduation nearing $20,000, this does mean you should approach college cautiously. Use the Bureau of Labor Statistic’s college outlook report to research the salary in the career you would like to pursue. Salary certainly doesn’t determine your job satisfaction, but it does give you an indication of your ability to pay back student loan debt.

The benefits of a college degree are undeniable – in general, college graduates have lower rates of unemployment, and earn more money over their career. Still, a college education is an investment like any other. Before making any expensive and long-term commitment, make sure you know what you’re going to do with it.

  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Live